Browse Exhibits (16 total)
Kirk-Holden War: Desperate Diseases Require Desperate Remedies
In 1870 Governor William Woods Holden of North Carolina put the Shoffner Act into effect which gave him the ability to use military power in select counties under states of insurrection. The governor was given the authority to decide when these counties would be in states of insurrection, which implied that civil authority was not strong enough to keep the peace and had therefore failed. This paper will discuss how the violence in several counties across North Carolina escalated to the point that called for the Schoffner Act to be put into place and how necessary it was to implement.
Republicans and the Ku Klux Klan in North Carolina

The end of the Civil War brought an era of Reconstruction to North Carolina as well as the rest of the south. The task of Reconstruction involved creating a society in which everyone was equal regardless of race. The struggle between the Republican and Democratic parties made this process difficult. The emergence of white rebellion groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, made it nearly impossible, especially since Republicans were key targets of Klan violence. Governor William Woods Holden and the Republican Party had the strenous task of suppressing the Klan violence. This task became a political war known as the Kirk-Holden War. Governor Holden carried out the decisions of the Republican Party, and these actions lead to his impeachment and the downfall of the Republican Party in the state.
The Impeachment of Governor William Holden
Governor William Holden was elected as Governor of North Carolina in 1868, seeing his term come to an end in 1871 after the House of Representatives issue eight different charges of impeachment against the Governor. Holden would be convicted on six of these charges, being acquitted of the two charges pertaining to his issuance of the Counties of Alamance and Caswell in states of insurrection.
The Ku Klux Klan in Reconstruction North Carolina: Methods of Madness in the Struggle for Southern Dominance
The Ku Klux Klan was known to be active in certain parts of North Carolina, but Klan activity and other white supremacist group activity became prominent in many counties of the state in the post-Reconstruction years. Once Union soldiers were no longer occupying the south, white supremacist groups began to dominate the landscape in the south and started a violent campaign to disenfranchise, lynch, and terrorize African Americans. When the Union soldiers left after Reconstruction, suddenly African Americans found themselves in very desperate and dangerous situations, sometimes life was even more tragic and terrifying than the pre-Civil War slavery years. The drastically negative changes that took place in these African American's lives help modern historians understand why and how violence and disenfranchisement protracted the rights, civil liberities, and safety of African Americans in the south until well into the 20th cnetury when the Civil Rights Movement began to gain a foothold in the U.S.
The Soldier’s Burden: A Study of North Carolina Confederate Officers’ Requests for Amnesty

Throughout Civil War and Reconstruction historiography, little can be found about presidential amnesty. Existing scholarship tends to focus on the political implications of amnesty, and does not often go in depth as to how or why excluded former Confederates advocated their deserving of amnesty. This research attempts to discover how former North Carolina Confederate military officers worked to justify their violent participation in the rebellion. In doing so, it will reveal that these former officers tended to stress the fact that they were removed from the political discourse that caused the rebellion, and portray themselves as reluctant soldiers doing their duty. Additionally, it will show that these former Confederate officers underscored their ethical conduct during war to show that they would be loyal and constructive citizens if accepted back into the Union.Â
The War Within: Interpreting the Civil War in the North Carolina Museum of History

This exhibit explores "the war within" at the sesquicentennial moment in North Carolina, arguing that the Civil War exhibits in the North Carolina Museum of History represented an interpretive ambivalence relating to how North Carolinians have chosen to remember the war over time. The author argues that three examples in the museum highlight three distinct (and conflicting) threads of Civil War memory--nostalgia, commemoration, and reconciliation.
Featured Exhibit
Forcing Confederate War Guilt, Displaying National Triumph: Salisbury Prison and the Salisbury National Cemetery
The Salisbury National Cemetery was built as a triumph to Union victory and attempted to force guilt on the former...