Search using this query type:

Advanced Search (Items only)

Scott King-Owen "Conditional Confederates: Absenteeism Among Western North Carolina Soldiers 1861-1865" (2011)

Title

Scott King-Owen "Conditional Confederates: Absenteeism Among Western North Carolina Soldiers 1861-1865" (2011)

Description

A common question that scholars and historians alike are trying to answer is why was desertion such a problem in Western North Carolina? Studies have shown that desertion was the highest out of the regions of the state, and North Carolina had the highest recorded desertion than all the states on the Confederacy. This article points out that while desertion may have been high, the men in the West generally returned to their post. They had left to help their family with the harvest, to protect their family, and just to see them as furloughs were hard to come by. The majority of the deserters were also of the age when they may have had young children, and they needed to help their wife around the house for a while. The author also suggests politics behind some desertions, as a lot of the soldiers felt that it was a "rich man's war, but a poor man's fight." This since that there was no reason for them to be going to war mad it hard to legitimize sacrificing themselves for a cause that would not help them out in the end. So this article states that while desertion may have happened at the reported scale, a lot of men did return loyal to their posts as soon as they thought they were able.

Creator

King-Owen, Scott

Source

King-Owen, Scott. "Conditional Confederates: Absenteeism among Western North Carolina Soldiers, 1861-1865." Civil War History. 4th ed. Vol. 57. Kent: Kent State UP, 2011. 353-79. Project Muse. Web. 16 Apr. 2012.

Date

1861-1865

Type

Document

Original Format

Journal Article

Text

Several scholars have determined that western North Carolina men, like Sergeant Wyatt, deserted in larger numbers than their compatriots across the state did. Richard Reid’s 1981 study found a desertion rate of 16 percent for western North Carolina, compared to 12 percent for the state as a whole. Peter Bearman’s 1991 investigation of a random sample of soldiers concluded that desertion in the mountains reached as high as 24 percent. Katherine Guiffre concluded, like Bearman, that western North Carolina soldiers deserted at much higher rates. Only Guiffre has offered a compelling reason for why mountaineers left the army in droves, implying that mountaineers’ preference for the Union might have something to do with their desertion rates. Connections among Unionism, disloyalty, and desertion emerged as explanations of mountaineer behavior during the war and grew more persistent thereafter in the works of the “Unionist Appalachia” writers of thelate-nineteenth century. Today, a compelling body of recent scholarship has largely dismantled the notion of western North Carolina’s isolation from the South but it has not explained mountain desertions.

New calculations of desertion by county show variation from 4.5 to 22 percent, explainable by circumstances of kinship, geography, and local politics rather than regional identity, slaveholding, or national politics. Moreover, statistical investigation of four companies from Buncombe County demonstrates a pattern of absenteeism that reinforces Sgt. Andrew Wyatt’s reason for desertion: men left their posts for short visits to their families but returned to duty. Though some mountain men joined bushwhacker and tory
bands, most absentee soldiers seemed to have considered loyalty to family paramount to their conditional loyalty to the Confederacy. No good could come of a war for southern independence if a man’s family perished from hunger or bushwhacker attacks while he was away defending them from
race-war–inciting Yankees. There could be no benefit to his family if, on the other hand, he remained away so long that his absence caused a southern defeat or shamed his familial and personal honor. The conditional loyalty of a mountain soldier rested upon the reciprocal pledge of support between the state and the soldier: the state protected him and his family in return for his defense of the state. The devastating effects of war in the mountains of western North Carolina, however, frequently called on the soldier to reconsider his conditional pledge of loyalty.

Embed

Copy the code below into your web page

Files

Civil War History

Collection

Citation

King-Owen, Scott, Scott King-Owen "Conditional Confederates: Absenteeism Among Western North Carolina Soldiers 1861-1865" (2011), Civil War Era NC, accessed September 21, 2017, https://cwnc.omeka.chass.ncsu.edu/items/show/352.